|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
2475
   |
Posted - 2014.03.19 09:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain degree from behind the tank. Gunners on tanks cant change the camera so why should the driver be allowed to do that? It destroys tactical positioning for infantry and scouts who want to plant remote explosives onto it have no chance. As soon the tanker sees some 1 standing next to him he drives away at full speed.
Tanks allready have insane amount of HP, highest damaging weapons and with that should not have the advantage of the 3rd person view.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
2475
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 10:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:The dark cloud wrote:There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain degree from behind the tank. Gunners on tanks cant change the camera so why should the driver be allowed to do that? It destroys tactical positioning for infantry and scouts who want to plant remote explosives onto it have no chance. As soon the tanker sees some 1 standing next to him he drives away at full speed.
Tanks allready have insane amount of HP, highest damaging weapons and with that should not have the advantage of the 3rd person view. All you ever do is complain about tanks. How about you go to Call of Duty?
Shut up scrublord.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
2503
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 04:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lets hop back in:
LAV's are not a issue cause they are only a minimal threat on the battlefield, dropships need 3rd person view to be actually aible to aim with their front turret (ADS) cause its impossible to aim with it in 1st person. Ive only mentioned tanks simply because if you are into tanking then you should know the map and how your vehicle operates. The removal of the 3rd person view would aswell give you a reason to fit a small turret up top. So that your passanger (who is not a blueberry) can call out infantry who want to sneak up. Or just fit a active scanner and problem solved. After all you still have your radar. To top this you can still hear it if some 1 places remotes on your tank or not. They make a specific sound and knowing that counts as situational awareness.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
2505
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 06:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Medic 1879 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:The dark cloud wrote:There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain degree from behind the tank. Gunners on tanks cant change the camera so why should the driver be allowed to do that? It destroys tactical positioning for infantry and scouts who want to plant remote explosives onto it have no chance. As soon the tanker sees some 1 standing next to him he drives away at full speed.
Tanks allready have insane amount of HP, highest damaging weapons and with that should not have the advantage of the 3rd person view. All you ever do is complain about tanks. How about you go to Call of Duty? It is a viable idea tanks do get high HP, speed, damage, resists, range and the ability to just get out and kill the guy that gets behind you if you cant kill him with your turret. Having third person is yet another advantage I can manage to sneak up behind a tank get close enough to plant RE's on it but unless they are aiming as soon as I get close it zooms off the turret does a 180 and the tank I sneaked up on now can sit and kill me as he wishes simply because he can see behind him as well, and if he is aiming the RE makes a nice loud noise to alert the driver anyway so only the oblivious are threatened by this. Instead of just dismissing everything that might damage your play-style out of hand why not actually discuss things what if tanks lost the ability to watch their own backsides but could instead fit modules to compensate this like more powerful scans to pick up scouts crawling up your tail pipe, camera drones, proxy sensors etc... things that would allow a tanker to watch his ass but would actually involve a little bit of sacrifice to fit or having a top gunner watching your back with the small turret. Any thoughts on those or just dismissal of anything not a buff for your vehicle? I am not hating on the idea that we should be able to be ambushed, I am hating that if they remove 3rd person view completely we can only drive where the turret points, cause we would just be bumping into stuff 24/7 if we don't go where the turret points. To fix this problem all they need to do is let us switch between front bumper camera (same as front small turret but no rotation) and rear bumper camera in addition to turret camera. Now if we want to check if somebody is behind us (not on the sides) we need to either rotate the turret which takes a long time or switch the camera view and be unable to aim or shoot meanwhile.
What? Did you actually ever drove around in 1st person view? the controlls are exactly the same like in 3rd person view. You can drive around like you used to. The only thing that you have to keep in mind is that your tank does not fit trough a door.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
2511
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 11:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:So far we have a number of excuses why it should be taken away tho remember in BF3/4 all vehicles have 3rd person camera and no one ever had problems putting C4 on the tanks in that game
1. Balance - BF3/4 says it doesnt effect balance since C4 can be easily put on the vehicle, same applys in DUST it doesnt effect the ability to put C4 on it
2. Give infantry TPV - Im for that, give me a cardboard box and im good to go
3. If camera drones are real i should be able to shoot at them - They are cloaked and you cant see them
4. If camera drones are real i should be able to use EWAR to blind you/force you into FPV - They are immune to EWAR
5. Take them off tanks - So DS and LAV still have them just shaft the HAV drivers, yea no
Frankly weak arguments generally plus 1.8 adds cloaks so the 'i cant get close enough' is pure BS when your invisable
Yeah and on BF it takes like 1 sec to plant 3 C4's. While on dust it takes like 5 secs to plant a single one of them. I would be happy if i could put my remotes as quickly down like on BF. But then tankers would rage so hard that they bite into their controller.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
|
|
| |
|